*I’d like to preface this by stating I am not a nuclear expert, nor do I play one on tv.
Amidst the horrific tragedies of the 9.0 earthquake and the subsequent tsunami has occurred an infinitely more terrifying event. The nuclear power plant at Fukushima Daiichi for the most part is in full crisis mode offering up the potential of global radioactive impact. Please forgive my rhetoric as it smacks of doomsday but I’m fallible and just as influenced by hysterical media as the next poor bastard. However, its sadly become more and more apparent as the hours roll by that the scarier reports are more likely than the official line of “shit’s not good… but its not going to hurt you… but get the hell out of here or stay indoors…but don’t worry.”
The latest reports have all 6 waste pools having cooling troubles, 3 reactors with confirmed partial melt downs, and 1 reactor having strong signs of a containment leak. Efforts to control the situation are ongoing, but the valiant efforts of the brave people on site seems to be a losing battle. However, the most unnerving part about these “facts on the ground” is that there are varying reports and information looks to be censored. This leaves room for much speculation and hype as well plenty of “the sky is not falling” naysayers. Clear concise and prompt information should be absolutely demanded in a situation as critical as this, but the world is not getting that.
From what I can gather, if the waste pools are not effectively cooled, the water will boil off leaving decades of nuclear waste exposed. The heat generated from the spent fuel will cause the waste to melt and catch on fire emitting large amounts of particulate radioactive heavy metals into the atmosphere. This would essentially be a massive “dirty bomb” causing, quite literally, radioactive clouds and rain to spread regionally, and possibly globally.
Naturally nations all over the world are beginning to question and reassess their nuclear power facilities given these grim senarios. So whats the response here in the US? Business as usual. President Obama, with all his clean energy rhetoric, has all but come to the defense of the nuclear industry. His stance that nuclear power has to be an integral part of our energy policy has not wavered since his campaign, so i’ll give him credit on that, but sadly its been the wrong one.
Just because there are no greenhouse gas emissions does not mean nuclear power is green. That premise fails to recognize the massive amount of energy derived from fossil fuels it takes to build a plant, operate it, and to transport the energy created by the plant. So there are still great amounts of greenhouse gasses which can be directly attributed to nuclear power.
More importantly, greenhouse gasses are not the only environmental issue at stake. Nuclear power plants require massive amounts of water which can pollute and put a strain on local aquatic systems. They generate a lot of heat which certainly influences local ecosystems and atmosphere. Nuclear plants require a lot of land which damages habitat and most importantly NUCLEAR RADIATION CAN KILL STUFF. The fact still remains that even though the containment of reactors can be relatively safe, there is no sound way to deal with the nuclear waste, which ultimately is the greatest concern.
Beyond environmental and public health concerns lies the costs of security and safe operation. Since 9/11 there has been mere lip service paid to the protection of our nation’s nuclear facilities from attack. However, there has not been wide scale security audits and many facilities are vulnerable. Additionally, many plants which were built decades ago, are simply not designed to withstand certain acts of god the likes of which have struck Japan.
A simple cost benefit analysis which includes the externalities of environmental, human health, security, and safe operation concerns will conclude that nuclear power is about as smart as buying Bear Sterns stock in the summer of 2008. Its simply insane. Yet our nation’s leadership plods forward with nuclear power as part of the solution to getting off of fossil fuels. Perhaps i’m being naive in thinking that an incomprehensible tragedy such that is taking place at the Fukushima Daiichi plant could smack some sense into our politicians. But I only need to look back at last summers incomprehensible tragedy that took place in the Gulf of Mexico to realize change is not something I can believe in.
Read Full Post »